| @TzviyaSiegman @danbri literally the best (Twitter) | |
| @danbri I couldn’t agree more. (Twitter) | |
| @neumarcx @cwilso @danbri @blaine @w3c @jyasskin @drummondreed No. Well, certainly not unilaterally. I'd expect them to clear such a move with their AC rep. (Twitter) | |
| @neumarcx @cwilso @danbri @blaine @w3c @jyasskin @drummondreed I’m not following. (Twitter) | |
| @neumarcx @cwilso @danbri @blaine @w3c @jyasskin @drummondreed Huh? (Twitter) | |
| @danbri @cwilso @neumarcx @blaine @w3c @jyasskin @drummondreed Yes, exactly. (Twitter) | |
| @neumarcx @danbri @blaine @w3c @cwilso @jyasskin @drummondreed Is there, though? (Room for discretion)
Like, if I publicly characterized something I myself said in Member space, that would clearly be okay, but this was not that. (Twitter) | |
| @neumarcx @danbri @blaine @w3c @cwilso @jyasskin @drummondreed enthusiasm (“keen to make a point”) doesn’t seem like a good reason to violate the W3C’s member agreement to me (Twitter) | |
| @danbri @cwilso @neumarcx @blaine @w3c @jyasskin Or, you know, to quote them. https://t.co/kh5zAsoQB2 (Twitter) | |
| @danbri @neumarcx @blaine @w3c @cwilso @jyasskin I wonder how appropriate it is for folks to publicly characterize Member-only things said by others. (Twitter) | |
| @danbri @w3c as each day passes, the odds of me completely butchering my hair go up and up. (Twitter) | |
| @danbri err, pinax the Django project, not pinax the twitter user. (Twitter) | |
| @danbri why @pinax of course! (Twitter) | |